Rating: Be the first to rate this Blog! | Votes: 0 | Views: 423 | Comments: 1 | Favorited: 0
Tags: theory - the - science - fossil evidence - formed - fossil - evolution - which - says - evidence - flood - water
October 10th, 2008
About This Blog
Bookmark on:
facebook
digg
del.ici.ous
reddit
Netvouz
Slashdot
Furl
Spurl
Google
Blinklist
Diigo
Technorati
Newsvine
Ma.Gnolia
Download for:
iPod | Cell Phone
Categories
Science vs. Evolutionism
Views: 423Added: Sun Feb 10th 2:30pm
Posted in: Other
Can the theory of evolution hold water? Is there any
empirical evidence for such a theory? The science says NO. The so-called
geologic column, the missing links, and transitional fossils don't exist.
Carbon dating doesn't work. The evolution theory is exactly that - a THEORY.
In the beginning, there was nothing. This nothing somehow exploded, and somehow
started to spin and somehow formed basic elements and POOF... here we are.
Sounds like a fairly tale for grownups.
There is more physical evidence for the Flood of Noah than
the entire evolutionary fantasy.
One example is... why are salt crystals (which can only be formed under water),
petrified clams and pillow lava (which only forms under water) found on the
tops of every major mountain chain? ANSWER - because the Bible says that the
flood covered the highest mountains by nearly 22 ft.
More later...
Scotty Adams
- » report
Posted 12:06 am May 28th, 2008Thanks for saying it's just a theory, somehow it become fact with out the fossil evidence to back it up, even Darwin said if the fossil evidence was not found then he was wrong